Joseph Goodman

15 catalog papers. Identity-linked publications and additional name matches are distinguished below.

ORCID: 0000-0002-0525-5219

Professor of marketing at The Ohio State University , 2100 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210

Publications

• What makes people happy? Decoupling the experiential-material continuum — Journal of Consumer Psychology 2023
• The Threshold-Crossing Effect: Just-Below Pricing Discourages Consumers to Upgrade — Journal of Consumer Research 2022
• Re-examining the Experiential Advantage in Consumption: A Meta-Analysis and Review — Journal of Consumer Research 2021
• The Material-Experiential Asymmetry in Discounting: When Experiential Purchases Lead to More Impatience — Journal of Consumer Research 2019
• When Consumers Prefer to Give Material Gifts Instead of Experiences: The Role of Social Distance — Journal of Consumer Research 2018
• Crowdsourcing Consumer Research — Journal of Consumer Research 2017
• Corrigendum to “Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis” [J Consum Psychol 22 (2015) 333–358] — Journal of Consumer Psychology 2016
• Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis — Journal of Consumer Psychology 2015
• Help or hinder? When recommendation signage expands consideration sets and heightens decision difficulty† — Journal of Consumer Psychology 2013
• Having versus Consuming: Failure to Estimate Usage Frequency Makes Consumers Prefer Multifeature Products — Journal of Marketing Research 2013
• Choosing Here and Now versus There and Later: The Moderating Role of Psychological Distance on Assortment Size Preferences — Journal of Consumer Research 2012
• Commentary on Scheibehenne, Greifeneder, and Todd Choice Overload: Is There Anything to It? — Journal of Consumer Research 2010
• Happiness for Sale: Do Experiential Purchases Make Consumers Happier than Material Purchases? — Journal of Consumer Research 2009
• Special random numbers: Beyond the illusion of control — Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006
• Are Critics More Credible? When Positivity Is Expected, Negative Reviewers Are Perceived to Be Less Credible — Journal of Consumer Research