M. David Piercey

14 catalog papers. Identity-linked publications and additional name matches are distinguished below.

ORCID: 0000-0001-6494-667X

University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA

Publications

• Would a Balanced PCAOB Inspection Approach Increase Auditors' Use of Innovative Audit Procedures? — Contemporary Accounting Research 2026 (name-matched, not ORCID-linked)
• What Are “Good” Values of q2? Guidance Based on Experimental Accounting Researchers’ Assessments of Fit — The Accounting Review 2025
• The Effects of High Estimate Uncertainty in Auditor Negligence Litigation* — Contemporary Accounting Research 2021
• Does an Audit Judgment Rule Increase or Decrease Auditors' Use of Innovative Audit Procedures?† — Contemporary Accounting Research 2020
• Custom Contrast Testing: Current Trends and a New Approach — The Accounting Review 2018
• The Relative Effectiveness of Simultaneous versus Sequential Negotiation Strategies in Auditor-Client Negotiations† — Contemporary Accounting Research 2017
• The Effects of Auditor Rotation, Professional Skepticism, and Interactions with Managers on Audit Quality — The Accounting Review 2015
• Unintended Consequences of Lowering Disclosure Thresholds — The Accounting Review 2015
• Managing audits to manage earnings: The impact of diversions on an auditor’s detection of earnings management — Accounting, Organizations and Society 2015
• Internal auditors’ use of interpersonal likability, arguments, and accounting information in a corporate governance setting — Accounting, Organizations and Society 2014
• The impact of anecdotal data in regulatory audit firm inspection reports — Accounting, Organizations and Society 2013
• The Effects of a Supervisor’s Active Intervention in Subordinates’ Judgments, Directional Goals, and Perceived Technical Knowledge Advantage on Audit Team Judgments — The Accounting Review 2010
• Motivated reasoning and verbal vs. numerical probability assessment: Evidence from an accounting context — Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2009
• Judging Audit Quality in Light of Adverse Outcomes: Evidence of Outcome Bias and Reverse Outcome Bias* — Contemporary Accounting Research 2008