Should collective bargaining and labor relations be less adversarial?
Journal of Business Ethics · 1985 · Volume 4 · Issue 4
Abstract
In this paper I argue that the poker analogy is unsuitable as a model for collective bargaining negotiations. Using the poker game analogy is imprudent, its use undermines trust and ignores the cooperative features of business, and its use fails to take into account the values of dignity and fairness which should characterize labor-management negotiations. I propose and defend a model of ideal family decision-making as a superior model to the poker game.
Keywords
Economic Growth, Defend, Collective Bargaining, Labor Relation, Ideal Family
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.