Limited paternalism and the Pontius Pilate Plight
Journal of Business Ethics · 1989 · Volume 8 · Issue 12
Abstract
Ebejer and Morden (‘Paternalism in the Marketplace: Should a Salesman Be His Buyer's Keeper?”,Journal of Business Ethics7, 1988) propose ‘limited paternalism’ as a sufficient regulative condition for a professional ethic of sales. Although the principle is immediately appealing, its application can lead to a counter-productive ethical quandary I call the Pontius Pilate Plight. This quandary is the assumption that ethical agents' hands are clean in certain situations even if they have done something they condemn as immoral. Since limited paternalism can give rise to this queer conclusion in the salesperson/buyer relationship, the principle is suspect. It may be a necessary condition for ethical sales, but is not sufficient. This discussion concludes by suggesting two additional criteria which, when complemented by the limited paternalism principle, are jointly sufficient.
Keywords
Economic Growth, Business Ethic, Regulative Condition, Additional Criterion, Professional Ethic
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.