Justice in preferential hiring
Journal of Business Ethics · 1991 · Volume 10 · Issue 10
Abstract
This paper reports studies designed to examine perceptions of preferential selection. Subjects evaluated the fairness of hypothetical cases of selection decisions based on either candidate sex or ethnic origin. A within-subjects design and a between-subjects design yielded convergent results showing that (1) preferential selection was perceived as unfair, irrespective of respondent sex or the basis for the preferential treatment (i.e., candidate sex or ethnic origin), (2) the level of perceived injustice was directly related to the discrepancy in merits between the successful minority candidate and the more qualified yet unsuccessful majority candidate, and (3) the provision of either an “ethical” or “legislative” justification for the selection decisions further exacerbated feelings of injustice. Possible interpretations for the findings and practical implications of the study were then discussed.
Keywords
Economic Growth, Practical Implication, Preferential Treatment, Ethnic Origin, Hypothetical Case
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.