The comparative test in marketing research and theory development
David Andrus, Daylin Butler, Wayne Norvell
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · 1987 · Volume 15 · Issue 4
Abstract
The comparative test has traditionally been viewed as a theoretical and methodological technique that was useful for making rapid advances in the development of marketing as a science. Enthusiasm for the comparative test is rooted in logical empiricism. Unexplored implications for the use of the comparative test in marketing are offered from the sophisticated methodological falsificationist and the social constructionist perspectives. A proposed solution to the problems that are created from using the comparative test in the traditional manner is presented. The solution proposed is relevant to methodology in science in general and should aid research and the development of theory in marketing.
Keywords
Marketing, Comparative Test, Social Constructionist, Theory Construction, Market Theory
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.