Spatial Ethics Beyond the North–South Dichotomy: Moral Dilemmas in Favelas

Daniel S. Lacerda, Fabio B. Meira, Vanessa Brulon

Journal of Business Ethics · 2021 · Volume 171 · Issue 4

Abstract

Western representation of countries from the Global South implies a dichotomist view of business ethics: on the one hand, universal ethics largely reproduces commonsensical views of the South as ‘less ethical’, and on the other hand, voices from the South are often conditioned to present themselves as substantially indigenous and unambiguous to be accepted as legitimate ethical subjects. We join the growing interest in bridging this gap by drawing on studies from human geography, and ask to what extent the materiality of moral dilemmas bespeaks the disputed underpinning ethical values of a given space. Drawing on Henri Lefebvre’s perspective of the production of social space, we outline and apply the idea of ‘spatial ethics’ to organizations, in order to approach the entanglement between center and periphery. We analyze organizations in favelas (Brazilian slums), which are, for many authors, territories where experiences are extreme, and poverty and violence mix with vibrant culture and ingenuity. We critically approach the field of business ethics and suggest that one way of moving beyond the North–South debate is to consider that ethics cannot be transmitted or represented in empty milieus.

Keywords

Spatial ethics, Favelas, Critical management studies, Business ethics, Global South

Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.