Scholion.ai

Responses to Ethical Scenarios: The Impact of Trade-Off Salience on Competing Construal Level Effects

Nelson Borges Amaral, Jinfeng Jiao

Journal of Business Ethics · 2023 · Volume 183 · Issue 3

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04995-x

Abstract

This research investigates the importance of trade-off salience in understanding how variations in consumers’ construal levels can influence moral judgments. Across five experiments, trade-offs are implied and explicitly made salient, and construal levels are manipulated by altering temporal distance and perceptual fluency, and by using a well-established cognitive method. Consistent with prior research, we demonstrate that higher construal levels can reduce anticipated unethical behavior, when trade-offs are not salient, by making higher-level moral values more prominent. When trade-offs are salient, however, we reveal that unethical behavior is increased when construal levels are elevated by making desirability-related thoughts relatively more prominent, compared to feasibility-related thoughts. Tests of mediation provide support for the role of desirability- and feasibility-related thoughts. Together, our results provide insight into the opposing predictions made by construal level theory for ethical decision making by revealing how trade-off salience, often inherent in ethical dilemmas, systematically influences the effects of construal level on ethical decision making.

Keywords

Ethical scenarios, Trade-offs, Construal level, Moral judgments

Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.