The relevance of quantifiable audit qualifications in the valuation of IPOs
Dimitrios C. Ghicas, Afroditi Papadaki, Georgia Siougle, Theodore Sougiannis
Review of Accounting Studies · 2008 · Volume 13 · Issue 4
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-007-9051-2
Abstract
How useful are audit qualifications to financial statement users? We analyze a sample of 204 firms that went public at the Athens Stock Exchange over the period 1987–2002. For 149 of these firms, auditors reportquantitativeestimates of the amount by which assets are overstated and/or liabilities are understated in reported financial statements. We find that underwriters and their affiliated analysts donotincorporate the negative information provided by these qualifications into offer prices and earnings forecasts. Investors, however, appear to efficiently impound the negative implications of the audit qualifications into stock market prices within the first day of trading. The results suggest that underwriters tend to align their interests with the interests of their clients, the old stockholders, at the expense of the new stockholders. They also suggest that the practice of reportingquantifiable qualificationsin audit reports is valuable to investors given that they are disclosed by an expert.
Keywords
Audit qualifications, Valuation, IPOs, Underwriters, Earnings forecasts
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.