Optimal illiquidity
John Beshears, James J. Choi, Christopher Clayton, Christopher Harris, David Laibson
Journal of Financial Economics · 2025 · Volume 165
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2025.103996
Abstract
We study the socially optimal level of illiquidity in an economy populated by households with taste shocks and present bias with naive beliefs. The government chooses mandatory contributions to accounts, each with a different pre-retirement withdrawal penalty. Collected penalties are rebated lump sum. When households have homogeneous present bias, β<math><mi is="true">β</mi></math>, the social optimum is well approximated by a single account with an early-withdrawal penalty of 1−β<math><mrow is="true"><mn is="true">1</mn><mo linebreak="goodbreak" linebreakstyle="after" is="true">−</mo><mi is="true">β</mi></mrow></math>. When households have heterogeneous present bias, the social optimum is well approximated by a two-account system: (i) an account that is completely liquid and (ii) an account that is completely illiquid until retirement.
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.