Scholion.ai

Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis

Wood, Robert E., Mento, Anthony J., Locke, Edwin A.

Journal of Applied Psychology · 1987 · Volume 72 · Issue 3

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.416

Abstract

Much evidence exists that supports the use of goal setting as a motivational technique for enhancing task performance; however, little attention has been given to the role of task characteristics as potential moderating conditions of goal effects. Meta-analysis procedures were used to assess the moderator effects of task complexity for goal-setting studies conducted from 1966 to 1985 ( n = 125). The reliability of the task complexity ratings was .92. Three sets of analyses were conducted: for goal-difficulty results (hard vs. easy), for goal specificity–difficulty (specific difficult goals vs. do-best or no goal), and for all studies collapsed across goal difficulty and goal specificity–difficulty. It was generally found that goal-setting effects were strongest for easy tasks (reaction time, brainstorming), d = .76, and weakest for more complex tasks (business game simulations, scientific and engineering work, faculty research productivity), d = .42. Implications for future research on goal setting and the validity of generalizing results are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.