A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability

Abstract

Despite scholarly criticism, juror attitudes or individual differences might affect verdict choice in criminal trials. Authoritarianism is a face valid predictor. 20 studies exploring the authoritarianism–verdict relation were meta-analyzed to test this hypothesis. Authoritarianism measure (traditional or legal), S type, presentation medium of trial, and type of crime were examined as moderators of the effect. Results support an authoritarianism–verdict relation and the moderator effect of authoritarianism type. Legal authoritarianism correlated more strongly with verdict. S type, presentation medium, and type of crime were also significant moderators. Implications for future research, as well as for legal and judicial practice, are discussed. This evidence strengthens the case for extended voir dire procedure in criminal courts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)