Face-to-face interaction in the peer-nomination process

Abstract

Tested the importance of face-to-face interaction in the peer-rating process. Peer ratings were obtained from 95 interacting group members participating in a management game and were compared with ratings obtained from os who viewed 15-min videotapes of these groups participating in a game decision-making session. There was no difference between the 2 sets of peer ratings, leading to the conclusion that face-to-face interaction is not a critical variable in this judgmental process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)