Preintervention effects of mediation versus arbitration
Johnson, Douglas F., Pruitt, Dean G.
Journal of Applied Psychology · 1971 · Volume 56 · Issue 1
Abstract
Examined the effects of the anticipation of various forms of 3rd-party intervention in a collective bargaining simulation. 50 male graduate students served as ss. Results indicate negotiators faced with a binding decision from a 3rd party behaved in a more conciliatory fashion and were more likely to reach agreement than those faced with a nonbinding decision. This effect was more significant for union negotiators than management negotiators. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.