Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance

Abstract

Self- and superior ratings of performance on 9 dimensions were obtained from an interorganizational sample of 102 managers by a mail questionnaire. It was found that self-ratings possessed less leniency, restriction of range, and halo error than did superior ratings. The ratings only partially met the requirements of convergent and discriminant validity. (15 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)