Scholion.ai

Ethical preferences for influencing superiors: A 41-society study

Ralston, David A, Egri, Carolyn P, de la Garza Carranza, María Teresa, Ramburuth, Prem, Terpstra-Tong, Jane, Pekerti, Andre A, Girson, Ilya, Herrig, Harald, Dabic, Marina, Tang, Moureen, Wan, Paulina, Hallinger, Philip, Palmer, Ian, Elenkov, Detelin S, Furrer, Olivier, Potocan, Vojko V, Wangenheim, Florian V, Maignan, Isabelle, Perrewé, Pamela L, Rossi, Ana Maria, Lenartowicz, Tomasz, Ledgerwood, Donna E, May, Ruth C, Weber, Mark J, Jesuino, Jorge C, Fu, Ping Ping, Naoumova, Irina, Casado, Tania, Riddle, Liesl, Richards, Malika, Butt, Arif N, Danis, Wade M, Castro, Francisco B, Ruiz-Gutiérrez, Jaime, Milton, Laurie P, Ansari, Mahfooz A, Brock, David M, Srinivasan, Narasimhan, Starkus, Arunas, Dalgic, Tevfik, León-Darder, Fidel, Thanh, Hung Vu, Moon, Yong-lin, Chia, Ho Beng, Christine Kuo, Min-Hsun, Molteni, Mario, Kangasniemi, Maria, Mellahi, Kamel, Wallace, Alan

Journal of International Business Studies · 2009 · Volume 40 · Issue 6

DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2008.109

Abstract

With a 41-society sample of 9990 managers and professionals, we used hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the impact of both macro-level and micro-l

Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.