Amendments and Corrections

Abstract

doi:10.1093/biomet/93.2.279 The paper included comparison of a 12-factor, 16-run design to randomly generated Latin hypercube designs and U -designs, with respect to the properties of their alias matrices. An error in a computer program led to incorrect computation of the properties of the alias matrix of the orthogonal design. A corrected version of Table 2 is provided here. The orthogonal Latin hypercube design still has better properties than the best of 100 random designs, but the differences are less striking than those in our original table.