Do Risk Disclosures Matter When It Counts? Evidence from the Swiss Franc Shock
LUZI HAIL, MAXIMILIAN MUHN, DAVID OESCH
Journal of Accounting Research · 2021 · Volume 59 · Issue 1
Abstract
We examine the relation between disclosure quality and information asymmetry among market participants following an exogenous shock to macroeconomic risk. In 2015, the Swiss National Bank abruptly announced that it would abandon the longstanding minimum euro-Swiss franc exchange rate. We find evidence suggesting that firms with more transparent disclosures regarding their foreign exchange risk exposureex anteexhibit significantly lower information asymmetryex post. The information gap in bid-ask spreads appears within 30 minutes of the announcement and persists for two weeks, during which new information gradually substitutes for past disclosures. We validate the information dynamics of past risk disclosures with three field surveys: (1) Sell-side analysts emphasize the importance of existing (risk) disclosures in evaluating the translational and transactional effects of the currency shock. (2) Lending banks’ credit officers rely on past disclosures as the primary information source available for smaller (unlisted) firms in the immediate aftermath of the shock. (3) Investor-relations managers use existing financial filings as a key resource when communicating with external stakeholders. The results suggest that historical disclosures help investors attenuate information asymmetry in light of unexpected news.
Keywords
risk disclosures, adverse selection, liquidity, information asymmetry, information dynamics, currency risk, archival studies, surveys
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.