Confidence intervals for causal effects with invalid instruments by using two-stage hard thresholding with voting

Zijian Guo, Hyunseung Kang, T. Tony Cai, Dylan S. Small

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) · 2018 · Volume 80 · Issue 4

Abstract

A major challenge in instrumental variable (IV) analysis is to find instruments that are valid, or have no direct effect on the outcome and are ignorable. Typically one is unsure whether all of the putative IVs are in fact valid. We propose a general inference procedure in the presence of invalid IVs, called two-stage hard thresholding with voting. The procedure uses two hard thresholding steps to select strong instruments and to generate candidate sets of valid IVs. Voting takes the candidate sets and uses majority and plurality rules to determine the true set of valid IVs. In low dimensions with invalid instruments, our proposal correctly selects valid IVs, consistently estimates the causal effect, produces valid confidence intervals for the causal effect and has oracle optimal width, even if the so-called 50% rule or the majority rule is violated. In high dimensions, we establish nearly identical results without oracle optimality. In simulations, our proposal outperforms traditional and recent methods in the invalid IV literature. We also apply our method to reanalyse the causal effect of education on earnings.

Keywords

Exclusion restriction, High dimensional covariates, Invalid instruments, Majority voting, Plurality voting, Treatment effect

Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.