Listening to Your Heart
Barnaby D. Dunn, Hannah C. Galton, Ruth Morgan, Davy Evans, Clare Oliver, Marcel Meyer, Rhodri Cusack, Andrew D. Lawrence, Tim Dalgleish
Psychological Science · 2010 · Volume 21 · Issue 12
Abstract
Theories proposing that how one thinks and feels is influenced by feedback from the body remain controversial. A central but untested prediction of many of these proposals is that how well individuals can perceive subtle bodily changes (interoception) determines the strength of the relationship between bodily reactions and cognitive-affective processing. In Study 1, we demonstrated that the more accurately participants could track their heartbeat, the stronger the observed link between their heart rate reactions and their subjective arousal (but not valence) ratings of emotional images. In Study 2, we found that increasing interoception ability either helped or hindered adaptive intuitive decision making, depending on whether the anticipatory bodily signals generated favored advantageous or disadvantageous choices. These findings identify both the generation and the perception of bodily responses as pivotal sources of variability in emotion experience and intuition, and offer strong supporting evidence for bodily feedback theories, suggesting that cognitive-affective processing does in significant part relate to “following the heart.”
Keywords
interoception, emotion, decision making, arousal, bodily feedback, somatic marker hypothesis, James-Lange theory of emotion
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.