How Robust Are Probabilistic Models of Higher-Level Cognition?
Psychological Science · 2013 · Volume 24 · Issue 12
Abstract
An increasingly popular theory holds that the mind should be viewed as a near-optimal or rational engine of probabilistic inference, in domains as diverse as word learning, pragmatics, naive physics, and predictions of the future. We argue that this view, often identified with Bayesian models of inference, is markedly less promising than widely believed, and is undermined by post hoc practices that merit wholesale reevaluation. We also show that the common equation between probabilistic and rational or optimal is not justified.
Keywords
cognition(s), Bayesian models, optimality
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.