The Evaluative Advantage of Novel Alternatives
Gaël Le Mens, Yaakov Kareev, Judith Avrahami
Psychological Science · 2016 · Volume 27 · Issue 2
Abstract
New products, services, and ideas are often evaluated more favorably than similar but older ones. Although several explanations of this phenomenon have been proposed, we identify an overlooked asymmetry in information about new and old items that emerges when people seek positive experiences and learn about the qualities of (noisy) alternatives by experiencing them. The reason for the asymmetry is that people avoid rechoosing alternatives that previously led to poor outcomes; hence, additional feedback on their qualities is precluded. Negative quality estimates, even when caused by noise, thus tend to persist. This negative bias takes time to develop, and affects old alternatives more strongly than similar but newer alternatives. We analyze a simple learning model and demonstrate the process by which people would tend to evaluate a new alternative more positively than an older alternative with the same payoff distribution. The results from two experimental studies ( N s = 769 and 805) support the predictions of our model.
Keywords
judgment, learning, attitudes, novelty, information sampling, open data
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.