Scholion.ai

STEM Training and Early Career Outcomes of Female and Male Graduate Students: Evidence from UMETRICS Data Linked to the 2010 Census

Catherine Buffington, Benjamin Cerf, Christina Jones, Bruce A. Weinberg

American Economic Review · 2016 · Volume 106 · Issue 5

DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20161124

Abstract

Women are underrepresented in science and engineering, with the underrepresentation increasing in career stage. We analyze gender differences at critical junctures in the STEM pathway--graduate training and the early career--using UMETRICS administrative data matched to the 2010 Census and W-2s. We find strong gender separation in teams, although the effects of this are ambiguous. While no clear disadvantages exist in training environments, women earn 10% less than men once we include a wide range of controls, most notably field of study. This gap disappears once we control for women's marital status and presence of children.

Keywords

Higher Education, Research Institutions, Returns to Education, Economics of Gender, Non-labor Discrimination, Human Capital, Skills, Occupational Choice, Labor Productivity, Wage Level and Structure, Wage Differentials, Professional Labor Markets, Occupational Licensing, Labor Discrimination

Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.