Scholion.ai

Simple and Approximately Optimal Contracts for Payment for Ecosystem Services

Wanyi Dai Li, Itai Ashlagi, Irene Lo

Management Science · 2023 · Volume 69 · Issue 12

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4273

Abstract

Many countries have adopted payment for ecosystem services (PES) programs to reduce deforestation. Empirical evaluations find such programs, which pay forest owners to conserve forest, can lead to anywhere from no impact to a 50% reduction in deforestation level. To better understand the potential effectiveness of PES contracts, we use a principal–agent model, in which the agent has an observable amount of initial forest land and a privately known baseline conservation level. Commonly used conditional contracts perform well when the environmental value of forest is sufficiently high or sufficiently low, but can do arbitrarily poorly compared with the optimal contract for intermediate values. We identify a linear contract with a distribution-free per-unit price that guarantees at least half of the optimal contract payoff. A numerical study using U.S. land use data supports our findings and illustrates when linear or conditional contracts are likely to be more effective. This paper was This paper was accepted by Beril Toktay, Special Section of Management Science on Business and Climate Change. Funding: W. Dai Li was supported by a Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship. I. Lo was supported by an Environmental Venture Project Grant from the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. Supplemental Material: Data and the e-companion are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4273 .

Keywords

contract design, payment for ecosystem services, information asymmetry, additionality, conditionality

Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.