An empirical analysis of the relationships among marketing journals, professors and administrators
Charles W. Lamb D.B.A., James U. McNeal Ph.D.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · 1977 · Volume 5 · Issue 4
Abstract
Coe, Robert K., and Weinstock, Irwin, 1968. “Publication Policies of Major Business Journals.”Southern Journal of Business(January) 3.Google ScholarCrockett, John H. and Moyer, Charles R., forthcoming. “Economic and Business Journals: Policies, Trends and Issues.”Academy of Management Journal.Jauch, Lawrence R., 1975. “Faculty Perceptions of Research Evaluation.”Journal of Society of Research Administrators(Fall) 6–14.Google ScholarJauch, Lawrence R. and Glueck, William F., 1975. “Evaluation of University Professors’ Research Performance.”Management Science(September) 66–75.ArticleGoogle ScholarMurray, John F. T., 1976. “Publish or Perish—by Suffocation.”Journal of Legal EducationVol. 27 (No. 4) 567.Google ScholarRoskies, Ethel, 1975. “Publish and Perish.”American Psychologist(December) 1165.ArticleGoogle ScholarScully, Malcolm G., 1976. “Strained Relationships Worry Scholars, Publishers.”The Chronicle of Higher Education(January) 1, 5.Google ScholarTuckman, Howard P. and Leakey, Jack, 1975. “What Is An Article Worth?”Journal of Political Economy(October) 941.Google ScholarVarble, Dale L. and Riordan, Edward A., 1976. “The Perception of Journal Publication in Faculty Performance Evaluation.”Proceedings of the 1975 Southern Marketing Association Conference(January) 243–245.Google ScholarZiman, J., 1976. “Anonymity of Referees.”Nature(January) 264.ArticleGoogle ScholarDownload references
Keywords
Marketing, Acceptance Rate, Journal Editor, Akron, Review Time
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.