Can segmentation improve predictive accuracy in conjoint analysis?
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · 1993 · Volume 21 · Issue 4
Abstract
Assmus, Gert, John U. Farley, and Donald R. Lehmann. 1984. “How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta-Analysis of Econometric Results.”Journal of Marketing Research21 (February): 65–74.ArticleGoogle ScholarDeSarbo, Wayne S., Michel Wedel, Marco Vriens, and Venkatram Ramaswamy. 1992. “Latent Class Metric Conjoint Analysis.”Marketing Letters3 (July): 273–289.ArticleGoogle ScholarDeSarbo, Wayne S., Richard Oliver, and Arvind Rangaswamy. 1989. “A Simulated Annealing Methodology for Clusterwise Linear Regression.”Psychometrika54 (December): 707–736.ArticleGoogle ScholarFenwick, Ian. 1979. “Techniques in Market Measurement: The Jackknife.”Journal of Marketing Research16 (August): 410–414.ArticleGoogle ScholarGreen, Paul E. and Kristiaan Helsen. 1989. “Cross-Validation Assessment of Alternatives to Individual-Level Conjoint Analysis: A Case Study.”Journal of Marketing Research26 (August): 346–350.ArticleGoogle ScholarGreen, Paul E., Abba M. Krieger, and Catherine M. Schaffer. 1993a. “An Empirical Test of Optimal Respondent Weighting in Conjoint Analysis.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science21 (Fall): 345–351.Google ScholarGreen, Paul E., Abba M. Krieger, and Catherine M. Schaffer. 1993b. “A Hybrid Conjoint Model with Individual-Level Interaction Estimation.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Volume 20. Eds. Leigh McAlister and Michael L. Rothschild. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 149–154.Google ScholarHagerty, Michael R. 1985. “Improving the Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research22 (May): 164–184.ArticleGoogle Scholar————— 1986. “The Cost of Simplifying Preference Models.”Marketing Science5 (Fall): 298–319.Google ScholarHauser, John R. 1978. “Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness, and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information Theoretic Approach.”Operations Research26 (May–June): 406–421.ArticleGoogle ScholarJohnson, Eric J., Robert J. Meyer, and Sanjoy Ghose. 1989. “When Choice Models Fail: Compensatory Models in Negatively Correlated Environments.”Journal of Marketing Research26 (August): 255–271.ArticleGoogle ScholarKamakura, Wagner A. 1988. “A Least Squares Procedure for Benefit Segmentation for Conjoint Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research25 (May): 157–167.ArticleGoogle ScholarMcFadden, Daniel. 1986. “The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research.”Marketing Science5 (Fall): 275–297.Google ScholarOgawa, Kohsuke. 1987. “An Approach to Simultaneous Estimation and Segmentation in Conjoint Analysis.”Marketing Science6 (Winter): 66–81.Google ScholarPerreault, William D., Jr. 1992. “The Shifting Paradigm in Marketing Research.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science20 (Fall): 367–375.Google ScholarWedel, Michel and Cor Kistemaker. 1989. “Consumer Benefit Segmentation Using Clusterwise Linear Regression.”International Journal of Research in Marketing6 (March): 45–59.ArticleGoogle ScholarWedel, Michel and Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp. 1991. “A Clusterwise Regression Method for Simultaneous Fuzzy Market Structuring and Benefit Segmentation.”Journal of Marketing Research28 (November): 385–396.ArticleGoogle ScholarDownload references
Keywords
Market Share, Predictive Accuracy, Market Research, Conjoint Analysis, Compensatory Model
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.