Scholion.ai

An empirical comparison of the results of five validity generalization procedures

Burke, Michael J., Raju, Nambury S., Pearlman, Kenneth

Journal of Applied Psychology · 1986 · Volume 71 · Issue 2

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.349

Abstract

With data originally obtained by the 3rd author and colleagues (see record 1980-31533-001 ), comparative results are presented for the noninteractive, interactive, independent multiplicative and Taylor Series Approximations 1 and 2 validity generalization procedures when there is nonzero sampling error. Findings indicate that the 5 validity generalization procedures yielded similar estimates of the fully corrected mean and variance of true validity coefficients. It is concluded that the 5 validity generalization procedures will lead to the same general conclusions regarding the effectiveness of a predictor measure. (16 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)

Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.