What Motivates Paternalism? An Experimental Study
Sandro Ambuehl, B. Douglas Bernheim, Axel Ockenfels
American Economic Review · 2021 · Volume 111 · Issue 3
Abstract
We study experimentally when, why, and how people intervene in others' choices. Choice Architects (CAs) construct opportunity sets containing bundles of time-indexed payments for Choosers. CAs frequently prevent impatient choices despite opportunities to provide advice, believing Choosers benefit. They violate common behavioral welfare criteria by removing impatient options even when all pay-offs are delayed. CAs intervene not by removing options they wish they could resist when choosing for themselves (mistakes-projective paternalism), but rather as if they seek to align others' choices with their own aspirations (ideals-projective paternalism). Laboratory choices predict subjects' support for actual paternalistic policies.
Keywords
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior, Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis, Intertemporal Household Choice, Life Cycle Models and Saving
Enable JavaScript for citation tools and additional paper interactions.